a comparative study of contemporary political islamic discourses with imam khomeini’s discourse
نویسندگان
چکیده
in this paper attempts have been made to study the discourses dominating political islam to answer these questions: how can one categorize these diverse political islam discourses? what are the similarities and differences among these discourses in general, and with the islamic revolution discourse in particular? the research methodology employed for this study is historical-comparative and the hypothesis of the paper suggests that various political islamic discourses can be categorized into two jurisdictional-rational discourse and narrative discourse. islamic revolution is included in the first category. the two discourses, however, have major differences in central signifier and in interpretations on the floating signifiers. to make a more accurate clarification of the two discourses, in this paper the two discourses have been compared and contrasted in terms of terminology and ideological commonalities with political consequences. to that end, viewpoints of the advocates of each discourse on such variables as their interpretations of monotheism and divine sovereignty, justice, excommunication, holy war, islamic unity, attitude toward sharia law, characteristics of islamic government and qualities of an islamic ruler, attitude toward political rights of people, attitude toward the west, modernization and new civilization have been studied. findings of this paper show that despite verbal and conceptual commonalities, there are major differences between the two discourses in interpretation of these commonalities, each of which is believed to have serious political consequences.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Contemporary Political Islamic Discourses with Imam Khomeini’s Discourse مطالعه تطبیقی گفتمان های اسلام سیاسی با گفتمان امام خمینی (ره)
متن کامل
A Comparative Study on Political Theology in Western and Islamic Political Thought
The science of the word and theology considered as expertise in area of concern of Islam religion in which it discusses about religious principle, approach and worldview based on rational and narrative reasoning and answer to doubts that pose in this area; in Christianity and in general through all monotheism religions, it could be possible to use this method for religious reasoning, it could b...
متن کاملA Comparative Study on the Concept of Political Legitimacy in Imam Khomeini and Jurgen Habermas's Thoughts
Political legitimacy is one of the basic and major concepts of political science especially political thought. Different views of the meaning and the concept of political legitimacy go back to the roots of political legitimacy. In this article by using a comparative style, the author will attempt to compare the concept of political legitimacy in Imam Khomeini and Jurgen Habermas's th...
متن کاملA Critical Study of Selected Political Elites' Discourse in English
This study explored how political elites can contribute to power enactment through using language. It started with a theoretical overview of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), and then presented a corpus consisting of speeches of eight political elites, namely, Malcolm X, Noam Chomsky, Martin Luther King, Josef Stalin, Vladimir Lenin, Winston Churchill, J.F. Kennedy and Adolph Hitler. This stud...
متن کاملa comparative study of language learning strategies employmed by bilinguals and monolinguals with reference to attitudes and motivation
هدف از این تحقیق بررسی برخی عوامل ادراکی واحساسی یعنی استفاده از شیوه های یادگیری زبان ، انگیزه ها ونگرش نسبت به زبان انگلیسی در رابطه با زمینه زبانی زبان آموزان می باشد. هدف بررسی این نکته بود که آیا اختلافی چشمگیر میان زبان آموزان دو زبانه و تک زبانه در میزان استفاده از شیوه های یادگیری زبان ، انگیزه ها نگرش و سطح مهارت زبانی وجود دارد. همچنین سعی شد تا بهترین و موثرترین عوامل پیش بینی کننده ...
15 صفحه اولSocio-Political Rights of Iranian Women before and after the Islamic Revolution; a Comparative Study
Feminism, as a social uprising, today is being considered by many thinkers and researchers. Proponents of this tendency believe that women are discriminated because of their sex and state they have certain needs that are not fulfilled in the society by governmental administrations. Therefore, fundamental changes must be made in the social, economic and political system to achieve females’ basic...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
اندیشه سیاسی در اسلامجلد ۲، شماره ۸، صفحات ۳۵-۵۲
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023